Welcome to Geminathon β a two-stage innovation challenge where bold ideas rise to the summit.
This is not just about building with AI.
Itβs about building intelligently, responsibly, and impactfully with Gemini at the core.
Participants will first pitch their idea.
The best ideas will earn the opportunity to build live.
Before you build, you must think.
In Round 1, teams will submit a Project Concept Presentation outlining their proposed web-based application powered by the Gemini API.
π― Your Mission (Round 1)-
π§ Clearly define a real problem
-
π Propose a web-based solution
-
π Show how Gemini API will be central to the system
-
π Demonstrate innovation and feasibility
β οΈ No working prototype is required in Round 1.
Only shortlisted teams will advance to the final build stage.
π Round 1 Submission RequirementsSubmit a 6β12 slide PPT/PDF including:
-
Problem Statement
-
Target Users
-
Proposed Web-Based Solution
-
Core Features
-
How Gemini API Will Be Used (must be central)
-
High-Level Architecture (optional)
-
Expected Impact & Scalability
Judging will focus on clarity, originality, and meaningful Gemini integration.
π₯ Round 2 β The Summit (Offline Hackathon)π Hackathon Date: 3 March
Shortlisted teams will build their project during the official hackathon timeline announced on the event day.
This is where ideas become working systems.
π Round 2 Project RequirementsProjects must:
-
β Be a functional web-based application
-
β Integrate Gemini API as a core intelligence layer
-
β Be developed during the hackathon period
-
β Be demo-ready by the end of the event
Any tech stack is allowed.
If Gemini is not central to your system, itβs not summit-ready.
π¦ Final Submission Requirements (Round 2)Each shortlisted team must submit:
1οΈβ£ Public GitHub RepositoryMust include:
-
Project overview
-
Setup instructions
-
Clear explanation of how Gemini API is used
β οΈ API keys must NOT be exposed.
2οΈβ£ Live Deployment Link-
Fully functional
-
Publicly accessible
-
Demo-ready
Include:
-
The problem
-
Your solution
-
How Gemini powers the system
-
Open to all registered Geminathon participants
-
Individuals or teams (as per event guidelines)
-
All skill levels welcome
-
Only Round 1 shortlisted teams may compete in Round 2
-
All participants must follow the code of conduct
Requirements
(Gemini-Centric Web Application Proposal)
π¦ Slide 1 β Cover SlideProject Title
Tagline (1 powerful line)
Team Name
Team Members
Hackathon Name
βPowered by Gemini APIβ
Clearly define:
-
Who is affected?
-
What is broken?
-
Why existing solutions are insufficient?
Use:
-
3β4 crisp bullet points
-
1 short real-world example
-
Optional stat (if available)
Keep it sharp and focused.
π¦ Slide 3 β Why This Problem MattersExplain impact:
-
Economic impact
-
Social impact
-
Developer pain
-
Productivity loss
-
Risk or inefficiency
Make judges feel urgency.
π¦ Slide 4 β Proposed Solution Our SolutionDescribe:
-
What you are building (web-based platform)
-
What it does
-
Who it is for
-
How it solves the core problem
Keep it high-level.
Do NOT reveal advanced architecture.
Explain clearly:
-
What Gemini analyzes
-
What it reasons about
-
What it generates
-
Why traditional systems cannot do this
Example framing:
Gemini interprets complex data, generates contextual insights, and provides explainable recommendations in real time.
Make Gemini central, not decorative.
π¦ Slide 6 β Key FeaturesList 4β6 major features.
Example structure:
-
AI-driven insight generation
-
Context-aware recommendations
-
Natural language query interface
-
Explainable outputs
-
Smart summarization
-
Predictive intelligence
Keep it crisp.
π¦ Slide 7 β Web Application Architecture (High-Level Only)Simple diagram:
Frontend
β
Backend
β
Gemini API
β
Database / External APIs
Do NOT show:
-
Internal pipelines
-
Automation engines
-
Deep ML stack
-
Advanced reasoning layers
Just show that itβs buildable.
π¦ Slide 8 β User JourneyStep-by-step flow:
-
User logs in
-
User uploads / inputs data
-
System processes input
-
Gemini generates insights
-
User receives actionable output
Make it visual and clean.
π¦ Slide 9 β Innovation & DifferentiationExplain:
-
What makes this different?
-
Why is Gemini essential?
-
Why is this scalable?
-
Why is this future-proof?
Use phrases like:
-
Explainable AI
-
Context-aware intelligence
-
Decision-support automation
-
Scalable AI infrastructure
Short section:
-
Multi-industry expansion
-
API integrations
-
Enterprise deployment
-
Real-time automation
-
Global scale potential
Keep it visionary but believable.
π¦ Slide 11 β Feasibility for HackathonConvince judges you can deliver.
Include:
-
Tech stack (React / Node / Python / etc.)
-
Deployment plan (Vercel / Render / Firebase)
-
Gemini integration approach
-
MVP scope clearly defined
Make them confident.
π¦ Slide 12 β Expected ImpactQuantify if possible:
-
Time saved
-
Cost reduced
-
Risk minimized
-
Decision speed improved
-
Productivity enhanced
Keep it strong and optimistic.
π¦ Slide 13 β Why We Should Be SelectedShort punch section:
-
Real-world relevance
-
Strong Gemini integration
-
Scalable architecture
-
Demo-ready plan
-
High innovation potential
Close confidently.
π PPT Design Guidelines (Very Important)Keep:
-
12β14 slides max
-
Clean UI
-
Dark theme or minimal white theme
-
Consistent fonts
-
Minimal text per slide
Avoid:
-
Huge paragraphs
-
Overly technical diagrams
-
Overpromising impossible features
-
Revealing Round 2 surprises
Your goal is:
Not to prove you built it.
But to prove you can build it.
Round 1 judges evaluate:
-
Clarity
-
Relevance
-
Innovation
-
Gemini usage
-
Feasibility
Round 2 offline =
Thatβs where you shock them with full architecture, deeper automation, and polished demo.
Prizes
Grand Winner
To be declared
Devpost Achievements
Submitting to this hackathon could earn you:
Judges
chandrayee kumar
Expert UST global,Caltech Grad
Debrath Banerjee
Senior Software Engineer at Walmart
Jeewan Singh
Senior Business Analyst ,Omnicom Group
Sajal Baisakhiya
Senior Principal Architect
Vijay Guntumadugu
azure lead data engineer
rajkumar kuppuswami
manager data analayst
Judging Criteria
-
1. Innovation & Creativity (25%)
- Originality of the idea - Unique problem-solving approach - Creative application of the Gemini API - Distinctiveness compared to other submissions -
2. Effective Use of Gemini API (25%)
- Meaningful and central integration of Gemini - Depth of AI implementation (not just surface-level usage) - Smart prompt design and response handling - Clear explanation of how Gemini powers the solution -
3. Technical Implementation (20%)
- Code quality and structure - Backend and frontend integration - Error handling and performance - Scalability and architecture decisions -
4. UI/UX & User Experience (15%)
- Clean and intuitive interface - Ease of navigation - Visual consistency - Overall user experience -
5. Impact & Practical Relevance (15%)
- Real-world applicability - Clarity of problem statement - Potential for scalability - Value created for users
Questions? Email the hackathon manager
Tell your friends
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

